The 2012 Podcast on mRNA: You Are What You Eat
- CoherenceClinic
- 23 hours ago
- 6 min read
Biologist Bruce Lipton’s 2012 Podcast: The mRNA story beyond you are what you eat.
Food as Molecular Information: What Bruce Lipton’s microRNA Story Means for Clinicians and Researchers
Why this matters for health professionals
Emerging work on dietary microRNAs suggests that food is not only a source of fuel and micronutrients but also a source of information that can tune gene expression, lipid metabolism, and possibly disease risk across the lifespan. This lens enriches clinicians', scientists', and public health practitioners' thinking about nutrition, GMOs, and personalized prevention.

Bruce Lipton’s early work on stem cells showed that genetically identical cells can differentiate into fat, muscle, or bone depending solely on the culture medium, underscoring that the environment determines cell fate. This observation foreshadowed today’s epigenetic paradigm, in which DNA is viewed as a responsive script rather than a fixed blueprint.
Epigenetic regulation operates through at least three well‑characterized mechanisms: DNA methylation, histone modification, and non‑coding RNAs such as microRNAs, which modulate which genes are expressed as proteins. Together, these systems integrate nutritional, hormonal, and psychosocial signals into durable changes in transcription and phenotype without altering sequence.
MicroRNAs: tiny regulators with outsized reach
MicroRNAs are short non‑coding RNAs that guide the RISC complex to target mRNAs, leading to translational repression, mRNA degradation, or transcriptional silencing depending on context. A single microRNA can regulate hundreds of transcripts, and a single mRNA can be targeted by multiple microRNAs, generating dense regulatory networks with substantial leverage over the proteome.
Circulating microRNAs are surprisingly stable in serum, where they are protected within microvesicles or exosomes and have become promising biomarkers for cancer and other diseases. This stability is central to the
claim that diet‑derived plant microRNAs could survive digestion, enter circulation, and participate in human gene regulation.
Cross‑kingdom microRNAs: “You are what you eat” made molecular
The Zhang et al. 2012 Cell Research study is the pivotal dataset Lipton highlights, reporting that rice‑derived MIR168a is present in human and mouse serum and liver and targets LDLRAP1, a key adaptor for LDL-receptor–mediated cholesterol clearance. In mice, chronic rice feeding reduced hepatic LDLRAP1 protein and increased plasma LDL cholesterol, effects that were reversed by antisense inhibition of MIR168a, arguing for a functional dietary RNA signal.
Mechanistically, plant microRNAs enjoy 2‑O‑methylation at the 3′ end and packaging in vesicles, features that confer resistance to gastric acid, RNases, and heat; in some models, boiling reduces but does not eliminate detectable signal. Complementary work on plant MIR2911 and in vitro intestinal models suggests that specific microRNAs can be absorbed via enterocytes—possibly through SIDT1‑like transporters—and repackaged into host exosomes. However, efficiency appears low and highly context‑dependent.[1]
The controversy: signal, noise, or both?
Replication has been mixed. A miRagen–Monsanto collaboration and other groups reported negligible levels of dietary plant microRNAs in mouse plasma, arguing that prior signals could reflect contamination, oversensitivity of the pipelines, or rare outliers. Others have reproduced uptake for certain microRNAs, notably MIR2911, emphasizing whole‑food matrices, microRNA identity, gut microbiota, and assay choice as critical determinants of detectability.
Unresolved questions include the threshold concentrations for meaningful target repression in vivo, interindividual variability in absorption, and the generalizability of MIR168a‑type findings across foods and microRNAs. For health professionals, this means cross‑kingdom microRNA biology is promising but not settled, warranting cautious curiosity rather than premature clinical claims.
GMOs, RNAi crops, and unknown small‑RNA exposures
Lipton extrapolates these findings to RNAi‑based GM crops, which are engineered to express small RNAs that silence pest genes and may accumulate at high levels in edible tissues. Given conserved sequence motifs between insects and mammals, off‑target binding of these RNAs to human transcripts is a theoretical risk, particularly if they are stable and bioavailable.
Regulators such as EFSA now treat RNAi plants as a special case, recommending bioinformatic screening of small‑RNA sequences against human and animal genomes and empirical assessment of their stability and absorption. This shift validates the underlying concern—dietary RNAs are no longer assumed to be inert—while also emphasizing structured risk assessment over blanket alarm.
Organic, “natural” diets: what is currently evidence‑based?
Lipton’s practical message—“think before you eat, return to more natural foods”—aligns with several strands of contemporary data on nutrition and environmental health. Meta‑analyses and recent reviews indicate that organic crops tend, on average, to have higher antioxidant content and lower cadmium and pesticide residues than conventional crops.
Epidemiological studies have associated higher intake of organic food with lower obesity risk, improved lipid profiles, and reduced incidence of metabolic syndrome. However, residual confounding by lifestyle cannot be excluded. Organic dietary patterns also appear to support a more diverse gut microbiota and lower exposure to endocrine‑disrupting chemicals, both of which may contribute to improved metabolic and immune outcomes.
Practical implications for clinicians and researchers
For clinicians and nutrition‑focused practitioners:
Emphasize whole, minimally processed plant foods as sources of macro‑ and micronutrients and potentially bioactive RNAs and metabolites, while acknowledging that cross‑kingdom microRNA effects are still under investigation.
When counseling on GM foods, distinguish between conventional transgenic traits and RNAi‑based traits, explaining that the latter raise specific small‑RNA questions that regulators are beginning to address explicitly.
For laboratory and translational researchers:
Treat dietary microRNAs as an intriguing class of nutritional signals that can be interrogated with rigorous exposure‑response designs, multiple orthogonal detection methods, and careful contamination controls.
Consider systems‑level models that integrate microRNA networks, metabolomics, and host–microbiome interactions to move beyond single‑microRNA, single‑target narratives.
For cross‑disciplinary teams:
Use Lipton’s work as a gateway to discuss how beliefs about genetic determinism shape patient behavior and research priorities, while clearly separating empirically grounded epigenetics from speculative mind‑over‑DNA claims.
Frame food as an information‑dense interface between environment and biology, opening common ground for oncologists, cardiologists, psychiatrists, and public‑health scientists to collaborate on preventive strategies.
Less than a decade later, we had SARS-CoV-2 RNA bundled into Lipid Nano Particles injected in arms. And research progresses to raise significant new questions about food safety with applications of patented technologies in the field of complex biodiversity, that used to be us.
KEY REFERENCES
Video and conceptual framing:
Lipton, B. H. (2012, October 20). Bruce Lipton – You are what you eat [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtwTEHW88k
Cross‑kingdom dietary microRNAsZhang, L., Hou, D., Chen, X., Li, D., Zhu, L., Zhang, Y., … Zhang, C.‑Y. (2012). Exogenous plant MIR168a specifically targets mammalian LDLRAP1: Evidence of cross‑kingdom regulation by microRNA. Cell Research, 22(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.158
Chen, X., Ba, Y., Ma, L., Cai, X., Yin, Y., Wang, K., … Zhang, C.‑Y. (2008). Characterization of microRNAs in serum: A novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Research, 18(10), 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2008.282
Yang, J., Farmer, L. M., Agyekum, A. A., Elbaz‑Younes, I., & Hirschi, K. D. (2016). Anomalous uptake and circulatory characteristics of the plant‑based small RNA MIR2911. Scientific Reports, 6, 26834. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26834
Snow, J. W., Hale, A. E., Isaacs, S. K., Baggish, A. L., & Chan, S. Y. (2013). Ineffective delivery of diet‑derived microRNAs to recipient animal organisms. RNA Biology, 10(7), 1107–1116. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.24909
Epigenetic and microRNA mechanismsAl Aboud, N. M., & Tupper, C. (2023). Genetics, epigenetic mechanism. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532999
Moore, L. D., Le, T., & Fan, G. (2013). DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 38(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2012.112
O’Brien, J., Hayder, H., Zayed, Y., & Peng, C. (2018). Overview of microRNA biogenesis, mechanisms of action, and circulation. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 9, 402. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00402
GMO RNAi risk assessment: EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). (2020). Risk assessment considerations for genetically modified RNAi plants: EFSA’s activities and perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00445
Petrick, J. S., Brower‑Toland, B., Jackson, A. L., & Kier, L. D. (2013). Safety assessment of food and feed from biotechnology‑derived crops employing RNA‑mediated gene regulation to achieve desired traits: A scientific review. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 66(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.03.008
Organic food and healthBarański, M., Średnicka‑Tober, D., Volakakis, N., Seal, C., Sanderson, R., Stewart, G. B., … Leifert, C. (2014). Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: A systematic literature review and meta‑analyses. British Journal of Nutrition, 112(5), 794–811. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514001366
Rahman, A., Azad, M. A. K., Rana, M. S., Hossain, M. A., & Hoque, M. M. (2024). A comprehensive analysis of organic food: Insights into nutritional quality, health benefits, and environmental sustainability. Nutrients, 16(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16030421
Lipton’s broader range of work, prequel and follow-on.
Lipton, B. H. (2005). The biology of belief: Unleashing the power of consciousness, matter & miracles. Hay House.
Gustafson, C. (2017). Bruce Lipton, PhD: The jump from cell culture to consciousness. Integrative Medicine: A Clinician’s Journal, 16(6), 44–50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6438088

Comments